﻿WEBVTT

1
00:00:11.970 --> 00:00:16.020
<v 0>Hello, my name is Nic Desjardins, and I'm a portfolio manager with Canso.</v>

2
00:00:17.220 --> 00:00:18.420
Before working at Canso,

3
00:00:18.660 --> 00:00:22.680
I served as an aerospace engineer in the Canadian Air Force. As such,

4
00:00:22.980 --> 00:00:24.570
I worked on various flight lines,

5
00:00:24.930 --> 00:00:28.500
but was also employed at the Canadian Space Agency as a robotics instructor,

6
00:00:28.890 --> 00:00:32.460
where I taught astronauts and mission controllers how to operate the Canada arm

7
00:00:32.520 --> 00:00:33.840
on the International Space Station.

8
00:00:34.350 --> 00:00:37.950
I believe we have a very successful history of finding value and investing in

9
00:00:37.950 --> 00:00:38.783
space at Canso,

10
00:00:39.600 --> 00:00:43.440
and the reason behind that is we were quick to recognize that the industry is in

11
00:00:43.440 --> 00:00:44.160
turmoil.

12
00:00:44.160 --> 00:00:47.280
Because of the complexity and the costs involved with sending an object in

13
00:00:47.280 --> 00:00:47.700
orbit,

14
00:00:47.700 --> 00:00:51.510
space has traditionally been left to governments and traditional satellite

15
00:00:51.510 --> 00:00:55.440
operators. But things are changing very fast. For one thing,

16
00:00:55.590 --> 00:00:59.310
advancements have resulted in a significant reduction in the cost of satellites.

17
00:00:59.370 --> 00:01:04.140
This has obviously opened the door to new startups.
Satellite launches have also

18
00:01:04.140 --> 00:01:07.560
become a lot cheaper. Between 1970 and 2000,

19
00:01:07.890 --> 00:01:12.690
the average cost to launch an object into space was almost $19,000 per kilogram.

20
00:01:13.080 --> 00:01:14.970
Because of advancements in launch vehicles,

21
00:01:15.330 --> 00:01:20.250
that cost has dropped at approximately $3,000 and is even expected to

22
00:01:20.250 --> 00:01:23.220
fall to $500. Taken together,

23
00:01:23.400 --> 00:01:27.630
the combination of advancements and reduced launch costs have improved the

24
00:01:27.630 --> 00:01:32.160
feasibility of many space-based activities and revive investments in space.

25
00:01:32.910 --> 00:01:33.780
To that effect,

26
00:01:34.110 --> 00:01:38.370
the global space economy is expected to expand from about $1.1 trillion to

27
00:01:38.370 --> 00:01:42.870
$1.5 trillion annually in the next twenty years. Naturally,

28
00:01:43.230 --> 00:01:45.240
some of this growth will be led by governance,

29
00:01:45.270 --> 00:01:49.020
but some of it will also come from commercial investments. In fact,

30
00:01:49.170 --> 00:01:52.140
investments in space have already hit record levels last year,

31
00:01:52.410 --> 00:01:55.950
reaching an all-time high of almost $9 billion,

32
00:01:56.250 --> 00:01:58.740
which is a 50% increase compared to the year before.

33
00:01:59.910 --> 00:02:04.470
Government budgets for space have also reached an all-time high of $83 billion

34
00:02:04.470 --> 00:02:09.060
last year, which is a 10% increase over 2019.
Now,

35
00:02:09.060 --> 00:02:11.850
to put those numbers in perspective, last year alone,

36
00:02:11.850 --> 00:02:16.770
the FCC received requests for over 80,000 new satellites,

37
00:02:16.770 --> 00:02:19.410
the first commercial satellite service mission was completed,

38
00:02:20.100 --> 00:02:23.220
the first private rocket reached the International Space Station,

39
00:02:23.970 --> 00:02:28.320
the C-band spectrum auction in the U.S. drove 13 new communication satellite

40
00:02:28.320 --> 00:02:29.153
contracts,

41
00:02:29.310 --> 00:02:34.170
and almost 1300 satellites were launched compared to 800 the year before.

42
00:02:34.740 --> 00:02:36.960
Satellites can take many different forms.

43
00:02:37.200 --> 00:02:40.950
One way to differentiate between them is to classify them in terms of the

44
00:02:40.950 --> 00:02:42.090
altitude of their orbit.

45
00:02:42.420 --> 00:02:47.130
60% of operational satellites today orbit around the earth in a region called

46
00:02:47.250 --> 00:02:49.320
"Lower Earth Orbit" or LEO,

47
00:02:50.010 --> 00:02:53.670
which encompasses orbits up to 2000km.

48
00:02:54.300 --> 00:02:57.900
This is where you will find Hubble, the International Space Station,

49
00:02:58.350 --> 00:03:02.890
and the former space shuttle. Given this proximity to the Earth's surface,

50
00:03:02.980 --> 00:03:07.540
LEO is also well-suited for weather and earth observation satellites. Now,

51
00:03:07.540 --> 00:03:12.160
there's also a very special orbit at an altitude of 36,000km above the

52
00:03:12.160 --> 00:03:15.880
equator called the "Geostationary Orbit" or GEO for short,

53
00:03:16.510 --> 00:03:20.290
where satellites appear to be stationary above a given point on Earth.
This is

54
00:03:20.290 --> 00:03:24.550
due to the fact that GEO satellites spin around the Earth at the same rate as

55
00:03:24.550 --> 00:03:29.410
the Earth rotates on its axis. Therefore, to someone on earth looking up,

56
00:03:29.620 --> 00:03:33.280
the satellite appears as a fixed point in the sky. Now,

57
00:03:33.280 --> 00:03:37.120
satellite TV providers were very quick to take advantage of this perceived fixed

58
00:03:37.120 --> 00:03:41.140
position by keeping their customers' antennas aimed at a fixed point in the sky

59
00:03:41.380 --> 00:03:44.350
instead of having to track a moving satellite. Finally,

60
00:03:44.830 --> 00:03:49.180
the region between LEO and GEO is referred to as "Medium Earth Orbit".

61
00:03:49.870 --> 00:03:53.230
There's very little to say about this region because it is pretty much a

62
00:03:53.230 --> 00:03:55.330
catchall between LEO and GEO,

63
00:03:55.780 --> 00:04:00.400
and does not have any real distinguishable properties. Obviously,

64
00:04:00.790 --> 00:04:02.620
the further away from Earth a satellite is,

65
00:04:02.830 --> 00:04:06.700
the better its view of our planet becomes. At 36,000km,

66
00:04:06.700 --> 00:04:09.850
a GEO satellite has a broad view of the Earth,

67
00:04:10.570 --> 00:04:14.380
while at under 2000km,
a LEO satellite has a very limited

68
00:04:14.380 --> 00:04:19.090
view. So, for example, a well-placed GEO communication satellite can,

69
00:04:19.090 --> 00:04:23.320
in theory, broadcast over North America and South America at the same time,

70
00:04:23.890 --> 00:04:27.730
which would be impossible for a LEO satellite. GEO satellites, however,

71
00:04:27.820 --> 00:04:31.000
are very expensive. Including launch,

72
00:04:31.000 --> 00:04:34.420
a GEO satellite can cost upwards of $500 million.

73
00:04:35.020 --> 00:04:38.770
This means that it usually takes 10 years for a fixed satellite operator to

74
00:04:38.770 --> 00:04:43.300
recover their costs, which is why they're built to last 15 years on average.

75
00:04:44.440 --> 00:04:48.850
As a result, GEO satellites are contracted for their entire fifteen-year life.

76
00:04:49.990 --> 00:04:52.270
When one of these satellites approaches the end of its life,

77
00:04:52.780 --> 00:04:56.200
contracts are renegotiated, and a new satellite is ordered to replace it.

78
00:04:57.280 --> 00:05:01.780
This entails that fixed satellite operator revenues and expenses are,

79
00:05:02.110 --> 00:05:06.490
or at least were, very predictable. However, along the way,

80
00:05:06.490 --> 00:05:10.030
something happened. Households found new ways to watch TV.

81
00:05:10.510 --> 00:05:12.670
This led to cable and satellite TV cutting,

82
00:05:13.030 --> 00:05:16.840
which in turn has destabilized the fixed satellite operator's business model.
To

83
00:05:16.840 --> 00:05:21.160
make things worse, satellite constellations are also becoming more feasible.

84
00:05:21.370 --> 00:05:22.203
Now, simply put,

85
00:05:22.390 --> 00:05:25.990
a satellite constellation is a number of satellites working together to maintain

86
00:05:25.990 --> 00:05:27.970
complete coverage of the Earth's surface.

87
00:05:28.240 --> 00:05:31.120
The number of satellites required to do this depends on the constellation

88
00:05:31.120 --> 00:05:33.610
altitude. Because of their higher altitude,

89
00:05:34.120 --> 00:05:38.560
a minimum of three GEO satellites are required to maintain complete coverage.

90
00:05:39.520 --> 00:05:43.210
Obviously, the lower the altitude, the more satellites are required.

91
00:05:44.020 --> 00:05:45.070
In the 1990s,

92
00:05:45.130 --> 00:05:49.690
a number of satellite constellations like Iridium and Globalstar raised billions

93
00:05:49.690 --> 00:05:52.720
of dollars to launch hundreds of satellite in orbit. Sadly,

94
00:05:52.720 --> 00:05:57.380
these constellations went bankrupt because of one fundamental error-they

95
00:05:57.380 --> 00:06:02.270
all grossly overestimated the demand for satellite communication. Yet,

96
00:06:02.660 --> 00:06:03.860
despite these failures,

97
00:06:04.130 --> 00:06:07.580
it appears again as though a new generation of startups wants to relive the

98
00:06:07.580 --> 00:06:10.160
errors of the past. At last count,

99
00:06:10.250 --> 00:06:14.120
there are close to ten proposed constellations vying to be the first to offer

100
00:06:14.120 --> 00:06:17.360
broadband internet to the world.
For example,

101
00:06:17.750 --> 00:06:22.700
Starlink has committed $10 billion to launch a constellation of 12,000

102
00:06:22.700 --> 00:06:23.533
satellites,

103
00:06:23.810 --> 00:06:28.160
and Telesat has committed $5 billion to launch their very own constellation of

104
00:06:28.160 --> 00:06:32.900
300 satellites. Now, if there is one thing that investors should recognize,

105
00:06:33.260 --> 00:06:35.150
is that markets hate uncertainty,

106
00:06:35.810 --> 00:06:39.170
and I think no one can argue that there is not a lot of uncertainty in the

107
00:06:39.170 --> 00:06:42.260
commercial space sector at this time. However,

108
00:06:42.590 --> 00:06:46.340
investors should also recognize that with uncertainty comes a potential for

109
00:06:46.340 --> 00:06:49.790
outsized returns. The way I look at it right now,

110
00:06:50.240 --> 00:06:53.600
fixed satellite service operators are caught in a perfect storm between

111
00:06:53.600 --> 00:06:57.110
cord-cutting and constellation euphoria. For one thing, though,

112
00:06:57.530 --> 00:06:59.960
despite the cord-cutting phenomenon in North America,

113
00:07:00.380 --> 00:07:02.780
other parts of the globe are still relying on satellites.

114
00:07:03.440 --> 00:07:07.640
Countries that did not take part in copper cable and fiber optic cable laying

115
00:07:07.640 --> 00:07:11.420
over the last half-century are now trying to catch up to their growing need for

116
00:07:11.420 --> 00:07:16.130
communications.
GEO satellites are still a very viable option for these

117
00:07:16.130 --> 00:07:20.180
countries and have therefore been a focus of fixed satellite operators for the

118
00:07:20.180 --> 00:07:21.050
last decades.

119
00:07:21.440 --> 00:07:24.620
Fixed-satellite operators have also responded to cord-cutting by launching

120
00:07:24.620 --> 00:07:27.560
satellites designed to meet our increased need for broadband.

121
00:07:28.400 --> 00:07:31.880
And this is where I think it gets fascinating because outside of Telesat,

122
00:07:32.450 --> 00:07:36.560
not one fixed satellite operator has jumped on the LEO Constellation bandwagon.

123
00:07:37.280 --> 00:07:38.960
So just like in the 1990s,

124
00:07:39.260 --> 00:07:43.310
the one industry that really should be driving this new initiative has decided

125
00:07:43.310 --> 00:07:46.490
to stay on the sidelines. Other than space being fascinating,

126
00:07:46.760 --> 00:07:50.030
given what is taking place in the industry in terms of advancements,

127
00:07:50.030 --> 00:07:52.130
our constantly growing need for communication,

128
00:07:52.610 --> 00:07:56.360
and a somewhat outdated business model of fixed satellite operators being pitted

129
00:07:56.360 --> 00:07:59.630
against a renewed interest for commercial satellite constellation,

130
00:08:00.350 --> 00:08:05.030
I hope that I was able to convince you of why space is a worthy consideration

131
00:08:05.030 --> 00:08:07.610
from an investment standpoint. Thank you.

